Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Ratliff v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02740
Defendant:
Tyler Hayden and Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Emily Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clark v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Caleb H. Ratliff, Mark Wallace, Craig Burnes and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. Ratliff
as 5:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Neisi Mendez
Defendant:
Joey Lee Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34487
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20791
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21677
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23454
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16158
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATLIFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14952
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RATLIFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
