Cases 1 - 10 of 90
STRICKLAND JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID STRICKLAND JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00800
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Harrison, William Patrick Flores, John Alan Fluck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PIECUCH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13954
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID PIECUCH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PEREZ-GUERRA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53850
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID PEREZ-GUERRA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
as 4:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46139
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID CLINE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
