Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 6:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richard Davis, IIIIn re: Richard Davis, III
as 23-13054
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD ODELL DAVIS, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12706
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVID DAVIS and RICHARD DAVID DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08023
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85019
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02276
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41996
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renee Bell v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 19-10568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENEE BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK G. RUNKER, RICHARD K. DAVIS, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor by Merger/Leader Mortgage (US Bancorp) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
