Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Damelio v. Target Corporation et al
as 9:2020cv80960
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Roto-Rooter Services Company and Rodney Romano
Plaintiff:
William Damelio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 2:2018cv01856
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company and Roto-Rooter Services Company an Iowa corporation doing business as Roto-Rooter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garrett et al v. Chemed Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
Justin Shipman, Brad Garrett, Jason Palmer and others
Defendant:
Chemed Corporation, Josephus Morrow, Roto-Rooter Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Yasharahla et al
as 1:2009cv01959
Plaintiff:
Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Zakar A. Yasharahla, Roto-Rooter Services Company and Trena Newberry
Counter Claimant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company
Counter Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type:
Contract
McGonigle v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv02330
Plaintiff:
John McGonigle
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roland v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv01150
Plaintiff:
Chase Roland
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kruse v. Roto Rooter
as 8:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kruse
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hesson v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 8:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hesson
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Strickland v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 1:2007cv01647
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Strickland
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company and Roto-Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
