Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06763
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25366
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STEVEN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12508
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90040
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Baker, Jr. v. B. Mount, et al
as 18-10838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY STEVEN BAKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
B. MOUNT, in his official and inidvidual capacities and KENNETH TUCKER, in his official and inidvidual capacities
Baker v. Mount et al
as 8:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Mount, Glenn R. Morris, J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Parsons et al
as 8:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Parsons, D. Lawrence, B. Mount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Jefferson County Board of Education
as 2:2010cv02713
Plaintiff:
Darryl Walker , Charles Horton , Kimberly B Ryan and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
