Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Labar v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Karen Labar
Defendant:
Sam Smith, Stephen Crook and Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSTY SAMS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv00114
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation, XYZ Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Shellnutt Allen and Janet Shelnutt Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melinda Pearson v. Augusta Georgia, et al
as 17-15275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELINDA BEAZLEY PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTA GEORGIA, through its Mayor Hardie Davis, Jr., in his official capacity, and its commission, in its official capacity, FRED RUSSELL, individually and in his capacity as City Manager, as a final policy maker, under color of law, BILL SHANAHAN, individually and in his official capacity, under color of law and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pearson v. Augusta, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Melinda Beazley Pearson
Defendant:
Augusta, Georgia, Fred Russell, Bill Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-13516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gifford et al v. City of Tampa et al
as 8:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Gifford, Wilbur Gifford, Paul Vann and others
Defendant:
City of Tampa, Pamela D. Iorio, William Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
