Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brisbon v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Aljennard Brisbon
Defendant:
Chatham County, Sgt. Bryant, Keith Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. James et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, CPL Kelly James, CPL Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Savon R. D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Robinson et al
as 4:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Sheriff Wilcher, Sgt Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Savon R.D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Sheriff John Wilcher, Dr. Vlasenko and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kirkland, Michael Green, Rashad Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. DeKalb Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2018cv03642
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, DeKalb Sheriff Office, CCS Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Mason v. John Rutherford, et al
as 10-11115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL MASON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, Sheriff, GORDON A. BASS, JR., SGT. MESSICK and others
Mason v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Michael Mason
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, Gordon A. Bass, Jr., Sgt. Messick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Meres et al
as 3:2009cv01173
Plaintiff:
Dannis Carol Woods
Defendant:
I. Meres, Rosanna S. Seay, Sandra Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
James Michael Mason
Defendant:
John H. Rutherford, Dr. Goodman, Nurse John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Barron et al
as 5:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis
Defendant:
Donald Barron, Sgt Bryant, Nikki Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
