Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Garcia et al v. Kitchen, Bath Cabinetry & More Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garcia and Frank Tejeda
Defendant:
Kitchen, Bath Cabinetry & More Inc. and Gilberto V Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tejeda-Guerrero v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Jose Ramon Tejeda-Guerrero
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TEJEDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19037
Plaintiff:
GIANCARLO TEJEDA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Juan Tejeda
as 23-13004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN TEJEDA
USA v. Carlos Tejeda, et al
as 23-12989
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS TEJEDA
Tejeda v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Merli Tejeda
Respondent:
Unknown and Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tejeda v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Merli Tejeda
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
TEJEDA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
FELIX EDUARDO TEJEDA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
