Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Timothy Sadler v. Mesa, et al
as 20-14701
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE BULLOCK, RAPHAEL GRAYBILL, KENDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Sadler v. Mesa et al
as 5:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah Aldin Yussuf Ibn Ayyub
Defendant:
Florida Clinical Laboratories, Inc, Louis A. Vargas, FNU Hugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Noel et al
as 5:2020cv00046
Defendant:
V. Mesa, FNU Mesa, FNU Badgly and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Timothy Ray Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timothy Sadler v. State of Florida, et al
as 20-10106
Defendant / Appellee:
MOSS, CO, STATE OF FLORIDA, FDOC ADMINISTRATORS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Sadler v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2019cv23871
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah-Aladin-Yussuf-JBN-Ayvub
Defendant:
Moore, Assistant Director, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2019cv00447
Defendant:
MOORE, RODERICK A BETTS, FDOC ADMINISTRATORS and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. VERBOIS et al
as 3:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Defendant:
GLENNAL M VERBOIS, SEAN ASHLEY TOLBERT, AMANDA MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, MORGAN, GORDON PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
