Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Faught v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2023cv01753
Plaintiff:
Valerie R Faught
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KINKLE et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02068
Plaintiff:
GERARD MCMILLAN, KATHY J. MCCAULLEY, JOHN D. ORCUTT and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caplan v. LAS BRISAS CAFE INC. et al
as 1:2018cv20633
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
LAS BRISAS CAFE INC., DONALD HARRISON, VALERIE R. HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Vernon Jewel of the Genealogy of Pearson One of the People v. Eric Myers et al
as 8:2014mc00026
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jewel of the Genealogy of Person One of the People
Defendant:
Eric Myers, Tampa Police Department, Hillsborough County Jail and others
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Lauris Boulanger, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61073
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lauris Boulanger, Inc., Dania Distribution Centre, LTD., Dania Distribution Centre Condominium Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Colony Insurance Company v. Scott & Son Engineering, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv60863
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
Scott & Son Engineering, Inc., Lauris Boulanger, Inc., Dania Distribution Centre, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv01116
Plaintiff:
Valerie R. Davis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
