Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J MCDONALD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44874
Plaintiff:
LAURIE J MCDONALD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23399
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEDRIC J MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv62050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02782
Plaintiff:
ZACHERY J MCDONALD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22153
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY J MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22156
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Vengroff Williams, Inc.
as 0:2018cv62459
Plaintiff:
John J. McDonald
Defendant:
Vengroff Williams, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Richmond v. McDonald
as 1:2018cv23843
Defendant:
Sergeant J. McDonald
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Richmond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
