Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. Love et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephanie Love, Derrick Dawson Logistics Co., Inc., Destine Rodriques Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Dada v. Andross et al
as 1:2023cv22770
Plaintiff:
Olufolayinka Dada
Defendant:
John Andross and Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Dada v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv22736
Plaintiff:
Olufolayinka Dada
Defendant:
Jeff Campbell and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Dada v. Young
as 1:2023cv21889
Plaintiff:
Olufolayinka Dada
Defendant:
Andrew M. Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
GS HOLISTIC LLC v. MARUTI DADA LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
GS HOLISTIC LLC
Defendant:
MARUTI DADA LLC d/b/a CRAWFORDVILLE SMOKE SHOP, HASMUKHBHAI PATEL and MARUTI DADA LLC doing business as CRAWFORDVILLE SMOKE SHOP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JJ'S OF GREATER ATLANTA, LLC et al v. NUCO2, LLC
as 2:2020cv14041
Plaintiff:
Dada of Delray Beach,Inc., RICHESON MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and JJ'S OF GREATER ATLANTA, LLC
Defendant:
NUCO2, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Broadstone Maple, LLC v. Ingram
as 1:2017cv02918
Plaintiff:
Broadstone Maple, LLC
Defendant:
Dada Ingram
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
