Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Ricardo Barba, et al v. Seung Heun, et al
as 12-7130
Petitioner - Appellee:
Ricardo Barba, Lily Christian, Heather Cleary and others
Movant - Appellant:
Lucie Vogel
Respondent - Appellee:
Seung Hee Lee, Journg Sook Lee, Dahn Yoga & Health Centers Incorporated and others
Claudia Giraldo, et al v. Drummond Company Incorporated, et al
as 11-7118
Petitioner - Appellant:
Claudia Balcero Giraldo, On behalf of herself, Christian A. Roca Balcero, Sebastian J. Roca Balcero and others
Respondent - Appellee:
Drummond Company Incorporated, Drummond Ltd., Augusto Jimenez and others
Mark Freeman v. Hugo Charvis, et al
as 11-7105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Elliott Freeman
Defendant - Appellee:
Hugo Charvis, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC, AMERADA HESS, Mummad Khaddfi, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC, UDCI, John Hess, OPEC, HOVENSA, HOVIC AMERADA HESS and others
James Sherley, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-5241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James L. Sherley, Dr. and Theresa Deisher, Dr.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Night-Light Christian Adoptions, individually and as next friend for Plaintiff Embryos, Shayne Nelson, Tina Nelson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Francis S. Collins, Dr., in his official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health and others
Donald Jones v. Louisiana State Bar Assoc., et al
as 10-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Louisiana State Bar Association, Mark C. Landry, Ronald H. Newman and others
James Sherley v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 10-5287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James L. Sherley, Dr., Theresa Deisher, Dr., Night-Light Christian Adoptions, individually and as next friend for Plaintiff Embryos and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Francis S. Collins, Dr., in his official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health and others
Silke Kroos, et al v. SBK Stiftung Braunschweigische
as 10-7082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Silke Kroos and Christian Kroos
Defendant - Appellee:
SBK Stiftung Braunschweigischer Kulturbesitz, A German Public Trust of the German Federal State of Lower Saxony
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant:
Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
Mary Ann Blackman, et al v. DC, et al
as 10-7019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mary Ann Blackman, MIKEISHA BLACKMAN, by her mother & friend, Paul Chassy, DR., DARYL BUCKNER, by his next friend & Court appointed educational advocate, SHAWN RECTOR, by his next friend and educational advocate, Carolyn Jones, JAMES JONES, by his mother & friend and others
Petitioner - Appellee:
Wayne Young
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation and District of Columbia Public Schools
Patrick Mahoney, et al v. John Doe, et al
as 09-7131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrick Mahoney, Reverend, Kaitlin Clare Mahoney, Christian Defense Coalition and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe, In his official capacity as a police officer, Metropolitan Police Department, District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation and Cathy L. Lanier, In her official capacity as Chief Police, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
