Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Eric Swalwell v. Donald Trump, et al
as 22-7030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Eric Swalwell, Representative
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his personal capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Trump, Jr., Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mo Brooks, Representative, in his personal capacity
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Evan H. Caminker, Vicki C. Jackson and others
Louis Ricks, et al v. RRRB
as 19-1229
Petitioner:
Louis Ricks and Vicky Monroe-Ricks
Respondent:
Railroad Retirement Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 14-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Davis, Senator, John Jenkins, Vicki Bargas and others
Jonathan Bourdon, et al v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 12-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Thomas Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Honorable, Secretary of the Navy, O Tom Crane, HR Specialist for NDW, Harris Cummings, Cheif Investigator for NDW and others
Jonathan Bourdon, et al v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 11-5302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Thomas Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Honorable, Secretary of the Navy, O Tom Crane, HR Specialist for NDW, Harris Cummings, Chief Investigator for NDW and others
James Lammers Kurtz v. USA, et al
as 11-5289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James D. Lammers Kurtz
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Wisconsin, Sheboygan County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
