Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Jerome Johnson v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-5128
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, U.S. Department of Navy
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Dennis Brewer v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 23-5052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis Sheldon Brewer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, Mr.; Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kimberly Cheatle, Ms.; Director, United States Secret Service, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mr.; Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Lamar Forbes v. Carlos Del Toro, et al
as 23-5012
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lamar A. Forbes
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas W. Harker, Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy and Randall Lamoureux, President, Naval Clemency and Parole Board
Jaskirat Singh, et al v. David Berger, et al
as 22-5234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sukhbir Singh Toor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaskirat Singh, Aekash Singh and Milaap Singh Chahal
Defendant / Appellee:
David H. Berger, in his official capacity as the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae:
Sikh American Veterans Alliance, Women Veterans and Families Network, Anti-Defamation League and others
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee:
Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
Domingo Gomez, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-5288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Domingo Arreguin Gomez, a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Mirna S., a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Vicenta S., a U.S. Citizen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of State and others
Jason Payne v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-5154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Payne
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President, Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Director, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
