Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Monte Rose, Jr., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5172
Intervenor:
Indiana Family and Social Services Administration
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Lang, Monte A. Rose, Jr. and Emily Rames
HIV and Hepatitis Policy Institute, et al v. HHS, et al
as 23-5301
Plaintiff:
HIV and Hepatitis Policy Institute, Diabetes Patient Advocacy Coalition, Diabetes Leadership Council and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of HHS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
HIV and Hepatitis Policy Institute, et al v. HHS, et al
as 23-5284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HIV and Hepatitis Policy Institute, Diabetes Patient Advocacy Coalition, Diabetes Leadership Council and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of HHS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Abdul Mohammed v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, et al
as 23-5197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Aetna Better Health of Illinois, Aetna Better Health Inc. and others
Asante, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Asante, Asante Three Rivers Medical Center, Asante Rouge Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Row 1 Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Row 1 Inc., doing business as Regenative Labs
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, solely in his official capacity, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Administrator of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, solely in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RICU LLC v. HHS, et al
as 21-5186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICU LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris W. Cochran, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Whitman-Walker Clinic, Inc., et al v. HHS, et al
as 20-5331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ward Carpenter, MD, AGLP: The Association of LGBTQ Psychiatrists, Bradbury-Sullivan LGBT Community Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Seema Verma, in her official capacity as Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Roger Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5295
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
