Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al
as 23-5239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, (NAACP) and others
Ronald Emrit v. Condoleezza Rice, et al
as 23-5063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Condoleezza Rice, Former Secretary of State and Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service, et al
as 23-5037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
British Secret Service, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation and others
Ronald Emrit v. Mark Milley
as 23-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Milley, Joint Chiefs of Staff
Ronald Emrit v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 22-5101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Microsoft Corporation and Federal Trade Commission
Ronald Emrit v. Christopher Wray
as 21-5185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 21-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, CIA
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy DeVos, et al
as 20-5108
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Education, Action Financial Services, Betsy DeVos, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Ronald Emrit v. FBI
as 20-5090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Ronald Emrit v. National Football League, et al
as 19-7165
Defendant / Appellee:
National Football League, Daniel Snyder and Washington Redskins
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
