Cases 1 - 7 of 7
USA v. Thomas Sibick
as 23-3127
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas F. Sibick
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
USA v. Thomas Sibick
as 21-3015
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas F. Sibick
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Michael Ciacci v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 12-5224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael K. Ciacci
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas F. Hogan, Judge, Director Administrative Offices of the United States Courts, Michael Ryan, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge, George Lane and others
Ada Ron-Messer v. Judges of United States Distri, et al
as 09-5343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant - Appellee:
Judges of United States District Court for the District of Columbia, District in Regular Active Service, Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, Thomas F. Hogan, Former Chief Judge and others
Holland, Michael H., et al v. Williams Mtn Coal Co, et al
as 06-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael H. Holland, as Trustee of the UNITED MINE WORKERS 1992 BENEFIT PLAN, Micheal Buckner, as Trustee of the UNITED MINE WORKERS 1992 BENEFIT PLAN, A. Frank Dunham, as Trustee of the UNITED MINE WORKERS 1992 BENEFIT PLAN and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Marty D. Hudson and Thomas F. Connors
Defendant - Appellee:
Williams Mountain Coal Company, a Corporation, doing business as Naoma Coal Company and Augusta Processing, Inc.
Third-Party Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Brewster and Robert Worley
Penn Allegh Coal Co v. Holland, Michael H., et al
as 98-7161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Penn Allegh Coal Co., Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael H. Holland, Marty D. Hudson, A. Frank Dunham and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Thomas F. Connors and Robert T. Wallace, Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
