Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jaskirat Singh, et al v. David Berger, et al
as 22-5234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sukhbir Singh Toor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaskirat Singh, Aekash Singh and Milaap Singh Chahal
Defendant / Appellee:
David H. Berger, in his official capacity as the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae:
Sikh American Veterans Alliance, Women Veterans and Families Network, Anti-Defamation League and others
Mirlin Toomer v. Mark Esper
as 20-5184
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark T. Esper, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mirlin Toomer
William Grant, II v. Joseph Dunford, et al
as 19-5074
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Lee Grant, II
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph F. Dunford, General and Joint Chiefs of Staff, (U.S. Department of Defense)
Government of the Province of, et al v. Estevan Lopez, et al
as 17-5242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Estevan Lopez, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Michael J. Ryan, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, David Rosenkrance, Dakotas Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of North Dakota
Government of the Province of, et al v. Estevan Lopez, et al
as 17-5241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Government of the Province of Manitoba
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Estevan Lopez, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Michael J. Ryan, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, David Rosenkrance, Dakotas Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of North Dakota
Grant Smith v. USA, et al
as 17-5091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grant F. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Michael R. Pompeo, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, James Mattis, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense and others
Govt of the Province Manitoba, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba and State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, John W. Keys, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, MaryAnne C. Bach, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
State of North Dakota
National Law Center on v. DVA, et al
as 14-5038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Law Center On Homelessness and Poverty
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Defense and others
Hani Abdullah, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 13-5203
Petitioner - Appellant:
Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah, Detainee, Camp Delta and Yosra Saleh Rashid Abdullah, Next friend of Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah
Petitioner - Appellee:
Rami Bin Saad Al-Oteibi, Detainee, Camp Delta
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Charles T. Hagel, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, Jeffrey Harbeson, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Abdul Naji v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-5191
Petitioner - Appellant:
Abdul Aziz Naji, Detainee
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, Tom Copeman, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander Joint Task Force GTMO and Robert M. Gates, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
