Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 188
TOBEE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff: LUSA KOI TOBEE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
William Windsor v. Scott Harris, et al
as 24-5138
Plaintiff: William Michael Windsor
Defendant: Scott S. Harris and Rashonda Garner
Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
as 24-7076
Plaintiff: Valerie Flores
Defendant: City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor, Wisconsin Board of Regents, Duane County, Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01339
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
SCOTT v. HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: JONATHAN SCOTT
Defendant: HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5034
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re: In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03502
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOSKOVITS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02958
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER MOSKOVITS
Defendant: SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?