Cases 71 - 80 of 308
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02150
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COUCH and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DEBORAH SINES, MICHAEL ISIKOFF, MARK MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2020cv01482
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NUNES v. WP COMPANY LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01403
Defendant:
SHANE HARRIS and WP COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff:
DEVIN G. NUNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00430
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Rafael Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. v. PSYCHOTHERAPY ACTION NETWORK et al
as 1:2019cv01854
Defendant:
PSYCHOTHERAPY ACTION NETWORK, NANCY BURKE, JANICE MUHR and others
Plaintiff:
GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM d/b/a TALKSPACE, GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. and GROOP INTERNET PLATFORM INC. doing business as TALKSPACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGLEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv03405
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, IRS and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
RONALD BAGLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARPAIO v. ROBILLARD et al
as 1:2019cv03366
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO
Defendant:
KEVIN ROBILLARD, HUFFINGTON POST, ROLLING STONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KLAYMAN v. FITTON et al
as 1:2019cv02793
Defendant:
JAMES PETERSON, CHRISTOPHER FARRELL, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAFFURI v. AL ARABIYA et al
as 1:2019cv03005
Defendant:
AL ARABIYA AL HADATH, SAUDI 24 TV, OTHMAN ALI MUHAMMED OMAR and others
Plaintiff:
KHALED SAFFURI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
