Other Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,959
NWOSU v. FRIEDRICH et al
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant: DABNEY FRIEDRICH and MICHELLE GRADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff: JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant: MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOOLI v. COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff: BASAVARAJ HOOLI
Defendant: COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAALIM v. WASHINGTON PASSPORT AGENCY et al
as 1:2024cv01338
Plaintiff: MALAK BAALIM
Defendant: WASHINGTON PASSPORT AGENCY, BRANDY, SHERIKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant: CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: EMERY SOOS
Defendant: DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOOKRA v. BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff: ARTHUR SOOKRA and APRIL BURCH-SOOKRA
Defendant: BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL, PFIZER, INC., XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL V. BEAIRD
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff: LORETTA HILLWARE, LORETTA HILL and LORETTA RANDOLPH
Defendant: JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SWANSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?