Cases 1 - 10 of 17
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Defendant:
TIFFANY ARIANA TRUMP, BARACK OBAMA, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
KEVON SIMMONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
HARRY CARTER, ROSEMARIE LUCERO, DOREEN HAINES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SIMMONS v. SKELONC
as 1:2020cv02845
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
DANIEL P. SKELONC and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.
as 1:2018cv00895
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DANIEL TIPPS , ANTHONY LABRUNO and others
Plaintiff:
KENDALL SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Graves, et al v. Cynthia Callahan
as 17-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rodney Ryan Graves and Dealva Simmons Graves
Defendant - Appellee:
Cynthia Callahan, In her Official Capacity as Judge of the Circuit Court for Judicial Circuit 6
GRAVES et al v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
RODNEY RYAN GRAVES and DEALVA SIMMONS GRAVES
Defendant:
CYNTHIA CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 14-7028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
