Voting Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff: EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Type: Civil Rights Voting
State of Texas v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant: State of Texas
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America and Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Davis, Senator, John Jenkins, Vicki Bargas and others
STATE OF TEXAS v. HOLDER Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant: ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Movant: ERIC KENNIE , ANNA BURNS , MICHAEL MONTEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting
STATE OF TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01303
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Intervenor_defendant: WENDY DAVIS , MARC VEASEY , JOHN JENKINS and others
Movant: MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS, TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , GREG GONZALES , LISA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff: DONALD G. JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?