Cases 31 - 40 of 382
BOWMAN v. SAVAGE et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
JOHN ELI BOWMAN
Defendant:
KENDRA SAVAGE, JONATHAN SCHULLER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Hunter v. John Larkins, III, et al
as 21-5301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason T. Hunter, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John K. Larkins, III, Magistrate, Federal Northern District - Georgia, Darrin P. Gayles, US District Judge, Fed. S. District - Florida, Harold Albritton, Sr. US District Judge, Fed. M. District - Alabama and others
HUNTER v. LARKINS et al
as 1:2021cv03021
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN K. LARKINS, III, DARRIN P. GAYLES, HAROLD ALBRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAITHER v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2021cv02366
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Defendant:
LATASHA HARRIS, ORBEY HARMON, LUCRETIA STROUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02341
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Director MICHAEL CARVAJAL, IAN CONNOR and others
MILES v. BARR et al
as 1:2021cv02271
Not Classified By Court:
KELVIN J. MILES, WILLIAM BARR, JOHN ASHCROFT and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN MILES
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERWOOD v. LEMASTER et al
as 1:2021cv01468
Defendant:
RAY MAZA, A.W.J. AMERALD, DAVID LEMASTER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN UNDERWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARSON v. CONGO et al
as 1:2021cv01384
Defendant:
CLIFF CONGO and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
HARVEY E. LARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
