Cases 1 - 10 of 24
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, JENNIFER DAVIS, JEQUAN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Earl Reyes v. Michael Duggan, et al
as 17-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Earl Reyes
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Duggan, Assistant Court Clerk/Case Analyst to the Office of the Clerk for the United States Supreme Court and United States
Keith Webb-el v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas R. Kane, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission, A. Smith, A-2 Unit Counselor, Federal Correctional Institution and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Mason, et al
as 16-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ms. Mason, A. Warden, Robinson, Unit Mgr., Wright, Case Mgr. and others
Michael Ciacci v. DOJ, et al
as 12-5295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael K. Ciacci
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Central Detention Facility, (CDF) Washington, DC and others
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC HOLDER, CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
