Cases 11 - 20 of 85
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of Alabama, et al v. EPA
as 16-1204
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Celia Y. Chen, Noelle Eckley Selin and others
Petitioner:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas, State of Arizona and others
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, HAL SINGER, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Petitioner:
NTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, L.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, William A. Ferrara, Executive Assistant Commissioner, CBP Office of Field Operations, in his official capacity, Raul L. Ortiz, Chief of U.S. Border Patrol, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Deborah Anker, James C. Hathaway and others
State of Arizona, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1159
Petitioner:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Ohio and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Reagan, Administrator
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1060
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Wood Council, State of Mississippi, State of Montana and others
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
