Cases 11 - 20 of 297
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ronald Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al
as 23-5239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, (NAACP) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ST. PETER v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY ST. PETER
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DR. PRINCY KUMAR, DR. MARY FURLONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ADAMS & GARTH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
