Cases 21 - 30 of 36
JENKINS v. RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2023cv02785
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, PROVIDENCE FIRE DEPARTMENT, BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF RHODE ISLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickholas Knight, Sr. v. Joe Biden Admin
as 23-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nickholas Knight, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Biden Admin, et al.
KNIGHT v. JOE BIDEN ADMIN
as 1:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
NICKHOLAS KNIGHT, SR and NICKHOLAS KNIGHT, SR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN ADMIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, JOE BIDEN, UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01658
Petitioner:
RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
