Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
STATE OF TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01303
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Intervenor_defendant:
WENDY DAVIS , MARC VEASEY , JOHN JENKINS and others
Movant:
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS, TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , GREG GONZALES , LISA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv00770
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 11-5087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William M. Windsor
Defendant - Appellee:
Orinda Evans, Judge, William S. Duffey, Judge, Julie E. Carnes, Judge and others
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 10-5177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William M. Windsor
Defendant - Appellee:
Orinda Evans, Judge, William S. Duffey, Judge, Julie E. Carnes, Judge and others
Christopher Strunk v. Department of Commerce, et al
as 10-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk, also known as Chris
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, City of New York, (NYC) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
