Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. DUFF et al
as 1:2018cv01746
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, LEE C. PRYMMER, WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN and others
Defendant:
JAMES DUFF and SHERYL WALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILMER GIBSON
Defendant:
JEFFERSON SESSIONS, ALEXANDER ACOSTA, MICHAEL S. HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Samuel Jewler, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Samuel Jewler, Brennan McFarlane, Jr., Antonya Huntenberg and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, James Schaefer, Sgt., in his individual capacity (#S777), Wen Ai, Ofc., in his individual capacity (#4412) and others
FONTROY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv01741
Plaintiff:
WALTER FONTROY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and FREDERICK ONOJA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MITCHELL v. JACKS et al
as 1:2015cv01990
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
IMAN JACKS, LASHEEKA R. DIXON, ALFRED L. HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
