Cases 51 - 60 of 77
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 10-5071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William M. Windsor
Defendant - Appellee:
Orinda Evans, Judge, William S. Duffey, Judge, Julie E. Carnes, Judge and others
JACKSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
HARRY R. JACKSON, JR., ROBERT KING, WALTER E. FAUNTROY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN FENTY and LEE F. SATTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WINDSOR v. EVANS et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant:
ORINDA D. EVANS, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JULIE E. CARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juan Evans v. Ricardo Urbina
as 09-5412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan F. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
Ricardo M. Urbina, Judge, Federal District Court for the District Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
EVANS v. URBINA
as 1:2009cv01992
Plaintiff:
JUAN F. EVANS
Defendant:
RICARDO M. URBINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juan Evans v. William Suter, et al
as 09-5242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan F. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, As the Clerk of Court, United States Supreme Court, Danny Bickell, Assistant Clerks, Court for the United States Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BAILEY et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2008cv01976
Plaintiff:
PEARL BAILEY, R.B., BYRINA BENNETT and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
