Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
SOOKRA v. BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SOOKRA and APRIL BURCH-SOOKRA
Defendant:
BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL, PFIZER, INC., XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAIRSTON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAIRSTON
Defendant:
COURTNEY L. SMITH, KENNETH M. CARPENTER, AMANDA L. MEREDITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BERRY v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT RUBIN, CITIBANK, ALAN GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sean Gaskin, et al v. Stephen May, et al
as 23-5124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sean Gaskin, John Scantlebury, also known as John Wayne Trotman and Frederick Christopher Hawkesworth
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen May, Gordon Patten, Jr., Jodi L. Avergun and others
Usman Jalloh v. Robert Underwood, et al
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Usman Jalloh
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Underwood, Officer, 6th District, Arthur Kimball, SGT, 3rd District, Sean Miller, Officer, Prince George's County Police, District III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FINNEX v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FINNEX
Defendant:
COMMONA WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, KENNETH FISHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BECHARD v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022mc00004
Plaintiff:
RYAN THOMAS BECHARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORP., KATHLEEN LYNN GEHRKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
