Cases 1 - 10 of 669
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
TARIQUE ROBERTS and JOHN DOE
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deafueh Monbo, et al v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 24-7070
Plaintiff:
Deafueh Monbo and Juahdi Monbo
Defendant:
Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc., Eskinder Afework, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
SOOKRA v. BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SOOKRA and APRIL BURCH-SOOKRA
Defendant:
BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL, PFIZER, INC., XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TERRELL v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
CHERYL R. BAILEY, LAURA A. CORDERO, ZABRINA W. DEMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
