Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HILLS v. MASON et al
as 1:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
ROLAND HILLS
Defendant:
CHERYL L. MASON, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. COOKSON et al
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
DARRIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALVIN COOKSON, DANNY MASON, ALICE COOKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASON v. FNU KENT
as 1:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
OLIVER MASON
Defendant:
FNU KENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MASON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02476
Plaintiff:
STACI MASON
Defendant:
VINCENT PARKER, MELINDA BOLLING, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BUHOLTZ v. TROMBITAS et al
as 1:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BUHOLTZ
Defendant:
SIMEON G. TROMBITAS, RICHARD N. HELFER, DAVID E. SALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
