Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHAPMAN et al v. U.S. BANK et al
as 1:2017cv02636
Plaintiff:
BERT E. CHAPMAN and LAMAR C. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, GINNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hartman, et al
as 15-5169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William G. Moore, Jr.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Blanche K. Moore
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hartman, Frank Korman, Robert Edwards and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
William Moore, Jr., et al v. Michael Hartman, et al
as 10-5334
Plaintiff - Appellee:
William G. Moore, Jr. and Blanche K. Moore
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Hartman, Frank Korman, Robert Edwards and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Antonio Santos and United States of America
William Moore, Jr., et al v. Michael Hartman, et al
as 08-5370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William G. Moore, Jr.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Blanche K. Moore
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Ross Hartman, Frank Korman, Robert Edwards and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
