Cases 1 - 10 of 38
FLOWERS v. GOODMAN
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
AL GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephanie Mykonos v. Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider, LLP
as 24-7035
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Mykonos
Defendant:
Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider, LLP, et al
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ISHAK v. GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
AKUA ISHAK
Defendant:
GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE CARMONA, CEDRIC BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AL-MUSAWI v. REPUBLIC OF IRAQ et al
as 1:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED A. AL-MUSAWI
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ, NOURI KAMIL AL MALIKI, CENTRAL BANK OF IRAQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickholas Knight, Sr. v. Joe Biden Admin
as 23-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nickholas Knight, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Biden Admin, et al.
CHOWDHURY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD MASUDUL HAQUE, MUHAMMAD FARUQE TALUKDER SOHEL, AL-HAJ MUHAMMAD NASHIR UDDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maria Sicinska v. George Handly, et al
as 22-5034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maria Sicinska
Defendant / Appellee:
George W. Handly, et al and Donald J. Trump
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
