Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor, Wisconsin Board of Regents, Duane County, Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BEY v. BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES MULTIFAMILY LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02035
Plaintiff:
SONCIER BEY
Defendant:
BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES MULTIFAMILY LLC, YARDS MANAGEMENT, MARIO CLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTHY et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2020cv01395
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PETER HARRIS, GLEN CLAY HIGGINS, MICKIE J. NILAND and others
Defendant:
CHERYL L. JOHNSON, NANCY PELOSI and PAUL D. IRVING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
KLAYMAN v. LIM et al
as 1:2018cv02209
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, ELIZABETH HERMAN, Esther Lim and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAYMAN v. FOX et al
as 1:2018cv01579
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, ELIZABETH HERMAN, H. Clay Smith III and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN, SR. v. AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2017cv02145
Defendant:
AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT, SHADY RECORDS, INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Pulphus, et al v. Stephen Ayer
as 17-5095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Pulphus and William Lacy Clay, Representative, United States House of Representatives
Defendant - Appellee:
Stephen T. Ayers, in his official capacity as Architect of the Capitol
PULPHUS et al v. AYERS
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
DAVID PULPHUS and WILLIAM LACY CLAY
Defendant:
STEPHEN T. AYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREEMAN v. FADD et al
as 1:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
FADD, JOHN HESS, HANK WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
