Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISOM v. TEXAS STATE et al
as 1:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
TEXAS STATE, CARRI COLE and STEPHANIE MITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amy Mischler v. Mike Pence, et al
as 22-5042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amy Mischler
Defendant / Appellee:
Mike Pence, Former Vice President of the United States, Alex M. Azar, II, Former Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, William Barr, Former Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MISCHLER v. PENCE et al
as 1:2020cv01863
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, SHANE BAUMGARDNER, KELLY CRAFT and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTHY et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2020cv01395
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PETER HARRIS, GLEN CLAY HIGGINS, MICKIE J. NILAND and others
Defendant:
CHERYL L. JOHNSON, NANCY PELOSI and PAUL D. IRVING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
