Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roger Shekar v. James Duff, et al
as 22-5211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roger Shekar
Defendant / Appellee:
James Duff, Anthony Scirica, Rebecca Pallmeyer and others
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRENADIER v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL (WFB) ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv01926
Defendant:
CARL SYKES, VINCENT HILL, BUTCH CONWAY and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, TIMOTHY D. CONWAY, JR., SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION et al
as 1:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION, GREGORY JOHN GUTFELD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00959
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD et al v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD, MICHAEL ALLEN and JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
