Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children H.J., Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children H.J., Y.J., and O.J., Ala'a Jibril, individually and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Troy Miller, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
FUENTES v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FUENTES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MOHARAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
FAHMI AHMED MOHARAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ABUDUMIJITI v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv02588
Defendant:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, HON JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Acting Commissioner MARK MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI and TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JIBRIL et al v. MCALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv02457
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Jibril, Khalid Jibril, Ala'a Jibril and others
Defendant:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Acting Commissioner MARK MORGAN, DAVID P. PEKOSKE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BAZ v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
KHUSHNOOD ALI BAZ
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN , JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
