Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEWIS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv03369
Plaintiff:
MALAIKA LEWIS and N. L.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MONIQUE BOYD, DIANE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party:
USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOBIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv03261
Defendant:
WILLIAM KENNEDY SMITH and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SOBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KENNEDY v. HODGES et al
as 1:2019cv02766
Defendant:
VICTOR J. WOLSKI, MARGARET M. SWEENEY, UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY et al v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2019cv01720
Defendant:
DAVID FRANTZ, ESTATE OF JL CHESNUTT, DAVID BRODERICK and others
Plaintiff:
COREY LEA and WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORTEZ v. SULTAN AL HITHALAYN et al
as 1:2019cv01642
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
