Cases 1 - 10 of 276
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Stephen Edwards v. Steven Logan, et al
as 24-5116
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Edwards
Defendant:
Steven P. Logan, Honorable, John Joseph Tuchi, Honorable, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
as 1:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
AMOS N. JONES
Defendant:
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dmt MacTruong v. John Salierno, et al
as 23-7155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dmt MacTruong, also known as Dr. Mac Truong
Defendant / Appellee:
John V. Salierno, Esq., Nicholas P. Corrado, Esq., Savio D. Figaro, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WILLIAMS v. BALLARD et al
as 1:2023cv02985
Plaintiff:
DANIECE ERLIENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL BALLARD, A. GUZMAN, P. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
