Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ATEBA v. JEAN-PIERRE et al
as 1:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
SIMON ATEBA
Defendant:
KARINE JEAN-PIERRE, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and KIMBERLY CHEATLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
GARZA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GARZA
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JULIAN ELIE KHATER and GEORGE PIERRE TANIOS
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv02063
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE HORACIO GOMEZ VELASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE OSCAR VELASCO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2019cv03848
Defendant:
CHARLES CHAPUT, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, DANIEL DINARDO and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, TIMOTHY DOLAN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
