Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
SUBER v. SUBER
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
ROBIN LOLANDA SUBER
Defendant:
ANDRE RICARDO SUBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02038
Plaintiff:
SONIA POWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN S. TROTT, THOMAS O. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDERON-LOPEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv00087
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, JONES LANG LASALLE and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO LOPEZ CALDERON-LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON-LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2019cv01630
Defendant:
ANNETTE L. HAYES, ANDREW C. FRIEDMAN, BRIAN WERNER and others
Plaintiff:
EILEEN RAYE LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CALDERON LOPEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01451
Defendant:
JEFFREY ADKINS, LISA NESBITT, HOPE SWANN and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ doing business as STARLIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
