Cases 1 - 9 of 9
EDWARDS et al v. STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
LUKE EDWARDS, ALABAMA - MISSISSIPPI FARM, INC. and HERITAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, IRA DRAYTON PRUITT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUERGER v. STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES et al
as 1:2020cv01576
Defendant:
AESAP DHR, STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES and ELDERLY SIMPLIFIED PROGRAM FOR SSI RETIREES
Plaintiff:
STEPHANI S. BUERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF ALABAMA v. FLOWERS BEY
as 1:2019cv00479
Defendant:
FRESHUM FLOWERS BEY and FRESHUN FLOWERS BEY
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
ERIE BAKER
Defendant:
SIBLEY REYNOLDS, STATE OF ALABAMA and BILL FRANKLYN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
STATE OF ALABAMA v. HOLDER
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Donald Jones v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 10-7124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Bobby Jindal, Governor, State of Louisiana, Sue P. Everhart, Republican Party of Louisiana and others
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Newdow, et al v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 09-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Arthur Newdow, Ellery Schempp, Mel Lipman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Presidential Inaugural Committee, PIC, Emmett Beliveau, Executive Director, PIC and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of Texas, American Center for Law and Justice, State of Alabama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
