Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Charles Hester v. Charlotte Burrows, et al
as 22-5312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
Charlotte A. Burrows, Chair, Janet Dhillon, Commissioner, Victoria Ann Lipnic, Commissioner and others
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03267
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., OATH KEEPERS, RYAN ASHLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
COSTIN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02484
Plaintiff:
GREGG COSTIN, DANIEL SCHULTZ, CASSIDY HOLLOWELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD AUSTIN and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
HESTER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv00639
Defendant:
DONALD C. MCCORMICK, CARLTON M. HADDEN, BRAD BAUDEK and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ann Melton, et al v. D.C. Government
as 17-7070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ann Melton, Gregory Dukta, Richard Paul Williams and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Government of the District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
QUARTEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01068
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA, CONDOLEEZZA RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
