Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5136
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5310
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant: KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee: IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff: TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant: 116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02828
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?