Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Martin Ruiz v. DOS, et al
as 24-5053
Plaintiff: Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant: United States Department of State, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security and Counter Terrorism and others
RUIZ v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv03631
Plaintiff: MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND COUNTER TERRORISM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Andrew Clyde, et al v. William Walker, et al
as 22-5263
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andrew S. Clyde, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Louie Gohmert, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and Lloyd Smucker, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellee: William J. Walker, In his Official Capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives and Catherine Szpindor, In her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives
Kevin Fennick v. John Staco, et al
as 22-5131
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Fennick
Defendant / Appellee: John Staco, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and United States House of Representatives
Republican National Committee v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5123
Plaintiff / Appellant: Republican National Committee
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, Elizabeth Cheney, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae: National Republican Senatorial Committee
Patrick Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board, et al
as 22-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrick J. Mahoney, Reverend
Defendant / Appellee: United States Capitol Police Board, in its Official Capacity, Karen H. Gibson, in her Official Capacity as U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper and Chair, Capitol Police Board, William J. Walker, in his Official Capacity as U.S. House of Representatives Sergeant at Arms and Member, Capitol Police Board and others
Thomas Massie, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5058
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas Massie, Hon., In his official and individual capacities, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Hon., In her official and individual capacities and Ralph Norman, Hon., In his official and individual capacities
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, Hon., In her official capacity only, William J. Walker, In his official capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives and Catherine Szpindor, In her official capacity as Chief Admin. Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives
MILLER et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL et al
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff: STEPHEN MILLER and CARRON DRIVE APARTMENTS LP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL and Hon. BENNIE G. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FINNEX v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff: KEVIN FINNEX
Defendant: COMMONA WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, KENNETH FISHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01827
Plaintiff: STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?