Cases 1 - 10 of 14
THOMAS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
WILBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv01926
Defendant:
CARL SYKES, VINCENT HILL, BUTCH CONWAY and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2018cv01888
Plaintiff:
CELESTE JONES and AUTUMN JONES
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE BOARD OF PAROLE and CHARLES A. PANNELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2017cv02805
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and CHARLES A. PANNELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v STATEWIDE WRECKERED SERVICE, et. al
as 1:2017cv02733
Defendant:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS, STATEWIDE WRECKERED SERVICE, DEKALB POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. BRILL et al
as 1:2017cv02479
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
GERRILYN G. BRILL, STATEWIDE WRECKERED SERVICE, DEKALB COUNTY POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. DEKALB CO. POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2017cv02480
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
DEKALB CO. POLICE DEPT., STATEWIDE WRECKERED SERVICE, GERRILYN G. BRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
XELUP v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2017cv02049
Plaintiff:
TUSHKAHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
